Tennis Films To Watch Before Wimbledon 2021

Tennis films, the court layout

It's not just tennis films that have recieved an underserved lack of attention from Hollywood studios, indie visionaries and international talent. It's actually all racket sports. Why have tennis films received such little attention as the main focus of films? Well.. It might be because it's been long-used as a novelty. There are many films which feature tennis, but very little that focus on the game dominantly.

This exclusion strikes us a bizarre, given that, when the 128th Wimbledon begins on the 28th of June, audiences across the world will be glued to their seats. It's not like tennis is dull, it's probably one of the better spectator sports. It also boosts the personality of big talents like Serena Williams, Novak Djokovic, Raphael Nadal, Roger Federer and Andy Murray. Ofcourse, these professionals can only hold a candle to the iconography of Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe and Boris Becker. The sport is also generally very popular, with a roster of international stars from France to Kazakhstan. In fact, Tennis is estimated to be the 6th most popular sport on earth with roughly 60 million active players (according to Pledgesports.com).

So, ahead of another tantalising Wimbledon, we'll be taking a look at tennis films past and present to find out which productions hit aces, and which never got over the net. We've even given them scores out of 5, fancy, eh? Get the strawberries and cream ready.

The losers

Tennis...Anyone? (2005)

With a budget of 1,200,000, Tennis...Anyone? is the lowest budget ‘Indie’ film on the list. The premise is simple, two low level Hollywood drifters attempt to find meaning in their lives by competing in celebrity tennis tournaments. The comedy, boosting an ensemble cast of Donal Logue, Paul Rudd, Danny Trejo and Jason Isaacs, manages to say a lot without actually saying much. There comes a point when this meandering around superficial themes designed, if anything, to jibe at the pointlessness of most Hollywood professionals, is actually quite endearing in a self-reflective sort of way.

There’s a vaudevillian element to the film. Meaning that it is over-dramatised and over the top in all fundamental ways, shaving incredibly close to irritating, but managing to with-tract just before the audience loses interest. The premise is simple, win at tennis, win at life. The characters all embody the sort of jerkiness that you might expect from Hollywood Exec’s infected with nepotism and over-indulgence. That makes their failure to produce anything remotely groundbreaking a fairly satisfying viewing experience. The addition of wholly untennis themes (Paul Rudd as an over-the-top Porn actor) and the title name (Tennis...Anyone? is a British idiom used to make fun of the bourgeois upper class) quickly express to the audience that this is a film that doesn’t take itself seriously. It would rather spend two hours picking fun at those who do. All things considered, using tennis to do this is perhaps the most sophisticated thing about the film. The amount of times a ball cascades into someones poor private parts, is definitely not.

All in all, Tennis...Anyone? is a lighthearted and amusing watch that oddly boosts some pretty decent tennis scenes. If you can forgive the low budget, and blur between Anglo and American humour, you’ll probably find yourself enjoying the experience. It’s a good reminder not to take the sport (or anyone in Hollywood) too seriously, and it does so in a dominantly passable manner. We recommend watching this before Borg Vs McEnroe, as the stark contrast is quite compelling. Best of the rest, 2.5/5.

Players (1979)

Players (1979) is a bizarre film. It can’t be summed up on this basis alone, but Players seems like a picture produced by a group of film students, let’s say four, three of which are unstable, unsupervised and untalented, while the fourth is just trying to do the best job they can. Setting a precedent within this list, it’s the tennis scenes in Players that outshine the humdrum padding around it.

The Romance-Comedy starts with Chris (Dean Paul Martin) a rising tennis star on the professional tennis circuit. It’s hard to know much about Chris’ deep set (or surface) motivations and desires, but he’s a protagonist (for lack of a better word) with high hopes of ambition and a subconscious lack of direction. The plot fills this direction with his instant and intense attraction to artist Nicole (Ali McGraw). There’s a rather large caveat, being that Nicole is already in a committed relationship with a wealthy older man. Knowing she has to pick between her heart and her head, Nicole battles between choosing wealth-induced security, or the unsure trajectory of Chris’ affections.

Buoyed by his evolving love affair, Chris somehow reaches the Wimbledon final, where the conclusion of his tennis season coincides with the crescendo of his romance, the picture shows the best of what it has to offer. Wimbledon, as it is through the majority of the film, is filmed with the respect and nuance it deserves. Huge crowds littered with quintessential British icons give the tournament a realistic feel, and there’s some tennis too, which in relation to the rest of the film, is satisfyingly passable. There’s even a John McEnroe cameo, although it’s unlikely he’d like to be associated with the film after its release.

Awfully reviewed and with a cult status of entirely forgettable, Players is one of those films you watch for a laugh. It has all the appeal of Sharknado 3, but if you’re into that sort of genre and like tennis, give it a go. It’s certainly entertaining, just for none of the intended reasons.

1/5

Break Point

Jimmy Price (Jeremy Sisto) is a reckless man-child on the last leg of his career as a doubles tennis player. When his latest partner drops him, he realizes he's officially burned all of his bridges on the pro circuit.

He decides to make one last-ditch effort to revive his career, reaching outside of the tennis world and convincing his childhood partner - his estranged brother Darren (David Walton), now an apathetic substitute teacher - to team up with him. The mismatched pair, with the help of a unique 11-year-old named Barry (Joshua Rush), make an unlikely run at a grand slam tournament and are forced to re-discover their game, and their brotherhood.

As predictable as the plot line is, the film is definitely not awful. The problem is, it definitely isn't good either. JK Simmons has done some bad films in his time, and the Whiplash Oscar winner seems out of place in the flick due to its bad pedigree and poor execution. There's no tactical play in the script, limited passion from performances, and no umpire-esque overseer directing the movie toward being a better film. It feels like everybody read the script, nobody liked it, but decided to do it anyway. It's a poor effort and doesn't possess the 'hilariously bad' moments that Players did. 1.5/5

  • Wimbledon (2004)

    Play trailer
    1h 38min
    Play trailer
    1h 38min

    Set just before the beginning of a much anticipated Wimbledon tournament, ailing tennis pro Peter Colt was once 11th in the world, as we fade-in, the journeyman sits at 119th. Colt is finished physically, depleted mentally, and hopeless romantically. Somehow, he squirms his way into the tournament's main draw through a wildcard and admits to himself that this is his last crack at grass-court success. Within this thought process, Colt understands he’s only a few poor games away from coaching at a prestigious tennis club, an incontrovertible undesirable well-known throughout the soon-to-be-ex-pro community.

    Colt’s mindset changes when he meets rising American star Lizzie Bradbury (Kirsten Dunst) and the crackles of love fray the air between the two. As the connection between the two deepens, Colt finds he’s playing the tennis of his life, reaching the semi-finals of the tournament. However, Bradbury shockingly bails out of the competition, and what was once a promising key to happiness for Colt turns into another perceived failure as she leaves London for her American home. Meanwhile, American no.1 and arrogant-as-hell Jake Hammond (Austin Nicols) has smashed his way to the final. Colt, without the spurring Bradbury, finds himself miserably down 2-0. When rain delays the game's continuation, it’s up to love to find a way back.

    Wimbledon is definitely a guilty pleasure of a watch. The pure-blood tennis fans might scoff at a few scenes, but most audience members will understand the dynamics of mindset and winning mentality and forgive the tennis faux pas. The dry British Rom-Com genre surprisingly suits the Wimbledon arena, and decent all-round performances make it a likeable and entertaining watch. 3.5/5

  • Match Point (2005)

    1h 59min
    1h 59min

    Match Point is perhaps the most non-tennis film on our tennis films list. However, it has enough tropes, metaphors, and upper-classity to emanate the sport. Woody Allen’s protagonist, Chris (Jonathon Rhys-Meyers), finds himself in the situation Colt was preparing for in Wimbledon, given that Chris finds his tennis career over, and his new economical venture coaching at a prestigious London tennis club. There’s a resonance of The Talented Mr. Ripley here, as Chris quickly finds himself adopted into an aristocratic family, and begins a relationship with Chloe (Emily Mortimer) the sister of his student Tom (Matthew Goode). It’s Tom’s fiancé Nola (Scarlett Johansson) who puts an unexpected spin on the ball of the narrative when Chris falls in love with her.

    As their romance and desire build, the knots around Chris’ idyllic wealthy family existence are strained and, under pressure, Chris gives in to his wants and desires in a web of lies and culmination of violence. Woody Allen once more twists the wrenches of love, using the scope of morality, the longevity of sporting success, and lust, to accurately portray a very entertaining 2 hours with some solid dialogue and original narrative. Although tennis is hardly the main focus, the psychology of the protagonist is primed through the angst of finishing his pro career and having to settle for less. As the narrative unwinds, it becomes obviously apparent that settling for less is not in Chris’s behavioural repertoire. 3/5

  • Battle of the Sexes (2017)

    Play trailer
    2h 1min
    Play trailer
    2h 1min

    If Match Point was barely tennis-filmable, The Battle Of The Sexes is the opposite. Yes, it still benefits and suffers from the biographical hi-jinx of Hollywood biopic dramas, but even the fact it is to some degree biographical embroils the film with considerably more tennis focus.

    Based on true events, TBOTS is set on the backdrop of a 1970 US Lawn Tennis Association tournament, where the prize money for women is ? that of the men. When the 9 biggest female tennis players withdraw from the tour in favour of starting their own organisation (That would eventually become the now dominant WTA). One of the pioneers of this movement is Billie Jean King (portrayed by Oscar-winner Emma Stone) who is challenged by the executives of men's tennis and ex-pro turned gambler Bobby Riggs (Steve Carrell). After women's no.1 succumbs to defeat against the 55-year old Riggs, the Lawn Association's decisions for unequal pay seem justified. It’s up to Billie Jean King, to set that record straight.

    The Battle of the Sexes utilises tennis in exactly the right way. The picture is tennis-focused, using an interesting part of the history of the sport to resurface important gender debates still occurring today. The argument is initially sparked by unequal pay, a debate that is still evident today, where women receive significantly less prize money than men in the majority of competitions. The story of Billie Jean King is one of the underdog, but it’s also one of pride, passion, dedication, and equality that has been expertly cannoned through the scope of tennis as a sport and as an organisation. With fantastic all-around performances and great costume, hair, and make-up design, it’s a must-watch ahead of the grass-court season. 4/5

  • Borg vs. McEnroe (2017) aka: Borg McEnroe

    Play trailer
    1h 43min
    Play trailer
    1h 43min

    There are sporting moments in every discipline that have been immortalised. It could be the sheer unlikeliness of the event (Leicester winning the premier league), the majesticness of the skill (THAT tiger woods putt that sent Nike shares through the roof) the expectations of a nation (Bobby Fischer vs Boris Spassky) seen in Pawn Sacrifice (2014) or, the collision of two personalities almost bigger than the sport itself. Within tennis, this came in the 1980 Wimbledon final, where American hothead John McEnroe battled against suave Swede Bjorn Borg in an epic showdown dubbed the ‘game of the century'.

    Borg vs McEnroe stars Shia La Beauf as the yank and Sverrir Gudnason as the Swede, reviving the classic rivalry with the panache and iconography of all white polos and bushy, terry-cloth headbands. The film takes a Scandinavian-centric view, not through biases in the narrative, but due to a Scandinavian production process beginning with a script by Swede Ronnie Sandahl.

    Like the contemporaries it diligently examines, the film is no-nonsense. It’s unequivocally about the tennis, and the players wielding the rackets. It’s as tennis-centric as a film has come and loses nothing of narrative value seen in more dramatic excursions. Perhaps we can owe this to the momentous and infamous match itself, but that would be unfair on the script, acting, directing, costume design, and editing of the piece, all of which are consistently good and sometimes superb. Naturally, Shia and Sverrir don’t resonate the years of tennis perfection evident in the real Borg/McEnroe, but at times it does a great job.

    Borg McEnroe is a high-octane and very enjoyable watch. Shia’s delivery of McEnroe’s ‘You cannot be serious!?’ certainly sent tingles up the spine and it is the acting from both leads that inspires the rest of the film with the grit and intensity tennis fans have pleaded for in a motion picture. Both educational and entertaining, it’s likely to be the top seed for the best tennis films on the court right now. 4.5/5

Uncover landmark films on demand
Browse our collection at Cinema Paradiso
Subscription starts from £15.99 a month.