Film Reviews by CD

I was not sure about the casting of the actors playing the young and older David Copperfield, but in the second part Hugh Dancy does very well in the title role. The support actors are very strong, in particular the actor playing David C's Aunt Betsey Trotwood, who introduces a kind of Mary Poppins energy to the role which works well. The adaptation is well paced over the two parts and the Irish film locations work well. The actor playing Uriah Heep is suitable "humble" and obsequious, and Micawber is given an interesting comic uplift . Overall a good watch.

I found this film very well acted with a good plot, but ultimately a bit unsatisfying. Having built up the characters well, the second half then moves into a rather bewildering set of hallucinations and flashbacks (a bit reminiscent of the 1987 Micky Rourke film "Angel Heart"), including some gruesome scenes. Interesting alone for the 1990s low tech far eastern context and the very fine acting and direction on display, but not a truly great film in my view.

I really enjoyed this film which has brilliantly created characters and a lot of dark humour amongst the cannibalistic goings on. The 19th California setting is a good one to choose, and the lack of any clear heroes is a plus. There are also some clever moral dilemmas and twists, and more than one surprise in the plot that keeps this film going strongly to the end.

It takes time to work out the context but the film seems to revolve around Iranian emigres in a US city.  The characters and actors are good and the hotel and manager are suitably creepy.  There are some stock horror moments, but through the film there is a more subtle creepiness that makes it quite absorbing.  My only criticism it that it seemed rather long and could have been reduced by 15mins to tighten it up at the end.  Overall worthwhile and recommended for those who like hotel based creepy films.

The period of the 100 years war is a good one to choose for a bloody tale of rivalry and misdeeds. Matt Damon seems a little miscast as the rough hewn knight facing a much more charming rival to his wife's affections. Jodie Comer is excellent as the wife. I agree with some other reviewers that the mix of accents grates somewhat, and also that the film is a bit long due to the technique of showing three viewpoints of the same event. This can work well if those viewpoints are very different, but not so well in this case where they are not. The film brings out the sheer brutality and chaos of the age well, but could have provided a much clearer historical context for those not so familiar with the events. It is never very clear as to who is fighting who and why, especially in Scotland. The Trial by Combat at the end is expertly done and with a great cameo role from the actor playing the young French king, it's a satisfying if very violent film. 3.5 stars for ambition.

If you are looking for a horror movie this is probably not for you. It is a very well acted, highly atmospheric and at times quite disturbing film about auto-suggestion, the power of suggestion from others and the realisation that life, which before was certain, is now so transient and about to be lost. The best scenes are the ones where several people are confronted by the assurance of one person that they themselves will die, and the impact that this has on their confidence. Also the admissions that people make to each other about how this changes everything for them. The script is quite limited but very powerful in places. As a watcher one finds oneself consciously shying away from even considering that one might die tomorrow in case one gets pulled into the action! - surely a testament to a very strong theme, expertly executed.

This is the second time I have seen this film since its release and I really enjoyed it again.  The acting is superb and the suburban caricatures make for an amusing, sometimes challenging (as in the case of the racism theme), and highly entertaining film played with true gusto by the cast. The plot moves along at a good pace and the baddies are truly mean.  The little boy’s expressions and gestures are beautifully done as he finds himself a pawn in the game.  

I had high hopes for this film having really enjoyed Jordan Peele’s other work.  I was confused almost from the outset and got the impression that this is one of those films that is very clever and amusing for those in the industry but for many viewers will leave them a bit cold.  The characters are quite irritating (partly due to the script) and the horror element seemed almost non-existent.  One for film buffs and total fans of this talented director.

This is the second time I have watched this film since its release.  It is a very taut and well constructed road movie with great characterisation and good action.  You may ,as I did find that the violent scenes are too much ( I had to fast forward) but the film really prompts one’s sympathy for the young people and for their courage in a truly awful situation.

This is a terrific film with great special effects and a good dose of dark humour. Always fun to see 1980s technology being presented as leading edge at the time. The opening scene is truly masterful and original. The directing and acting are great throughout and the storyline cleverly weaves in the paranoia and suspicion that build up as the true scale of "The Thing" emerges.

I was a little nervous about whether a 1949 film would stand the test of time. It does, mainly due to a good plot and excellent characters.  There are some good spooky moments and the camera work is excellent creating a very atmospheric and enjoyable film that keeps its momentum to the end.

I have seen this film 3 times now over the past 20 years and enjoyed it each time.  Marlon Brando gives life to one of the most sinister “regulators” in any of the films I have seen.  While Jack Nicholson seems a little out of normal character he does a good job and brings some extra humour to the role.  The other leads are all good and there is enough action to make this an enjoyable and visually well presented film. 

I am not sure what were the expectations of other reviewers but I really enjoyed this film. It is beautifully acted, very atmospheric and contains enough of an interesting plot to be very satisfying as a historical drama, while being slightly creepy in parts.  Thoroughly recommended.

This is the second time I have seen this film and I rate it very highly.  It’s a bit confusing for the first 20 mins as there are a lot of time shifts but the characters are really excellent and the lead actors are very strong.  The aspect I really like is change in the relationship between the two main characters as the story unwinds, the human and compassionate portrayal of ordinary Mexicans and the emotional transition of the main baddie.

This is described by some reviewers as "immersive". It certainly has almost no plot and the characters drift in and out without any real colour or identity. There are also experiments with the lighting that did not work at all for me - having minutes of darkness and other twilight scenes was not in any way compensated for by meaningful dialogue. Overall very disappointing.