Film Reviews by Alphaville

Welcome to Alphaville's film reviews page. Alphaville has written 843 reviews and rated 801 films.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Charlie's Angels

Abysmal and distasteful

(Edit) 30/08/2020

Abysmal teen fodder featuring a bunch of over-sexualised young women caked in make-up and designer fashion outfits (as in the signature Ariane Grande video on the DVD Extras). The clichéd plot lurches from atrocious attempts at humour to generic over-edited action scenes. Woke-friendly diverse skin tones? Tick (see DVD Extras). Female empowerment has never been so negatively portrayed. Hard to believe it was produced, written and directed by a woman, who also gives herself a role. Elizabeth Banks, you should be ashamed of yourself.

1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

In the Line of Duty

Will irritate your socks off

(Edit) 27/08/2020

The first quarter-hour features one of the best foot chases you’ve ever seen, with a resourceful kidnapper pursued by cop Aaron Eckhart. After that the film plummets to the gutter with misguided attempts at humour that make all ensuing attempts at action laughable for the wrong reasons. Worst of all, Aaron gets saddled with one of those hyper-irritating idiot teen girls who tend to pop up in films such as this. Usually it’s a daughter in trouble, but here it’s a social media nerd who live-streams everything and goes Whoo at appropriate points. Pity the killer can’t seem to shoot straight when she’s around. When the film ends with happy-clapping and cheering, the film’s decline into absurdity is complete. Such a shame after such a brilliant opening sequence.

1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Color Out of Space

Horror in the woods

(Edit) 24/08/2020

This companion piece to Mandy begins with Nicholas Cage living an idyllic life with his family on a forest farm. It can’t last, of course. Weird things soon start happening, though at such a slow pace that it takes a while to build any momentum. When things do eventually morph into full-blown horror you either like this kind of stuff or you don’t. It’s better than most of its ilk, although it would be more interesting if someone could get our Nick to underplay rather than overact for once (compare, for instance, the impact of A Quiet Place). Some of the gross-out scenes are unintentionally funny and might have been more interesting played as such. Still, director Richard Stanley makes a good fist of the meagre material and it’s worth sticking with for the psychedelic climax. It’s also good to see Tommy Chong (of Cheech and Chong fame) still on screen.

2 out of 3 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Mandy

Overblown gorefest

(Edit) 24/08/2020

It’s always good to see a mainstream genre film trying something different, and this is certainly different, with scenes of operatic intensity filmed in ‘phantasmagorical’ colour (or ‘abstract expressionism’ as the DVD Extras has it). Unfortunately the fact that it received a 4min standing ovation at Cannes says more about arthouse critics than the quality of the film. It’s sheer OTT nonsense. For every good thing about it (the opening King Crimson track, the colour palette, the synth score) there’s a bad thing (the awful title, the stylised acting, the glacial pacing).

In a companion piece to Color out of Space, Nicholas Cage is enjoying family life in the Pacific North-west forest (actually Belgium) when their idyllic existence is shattered by a band of clichéd cultish weirdos. Cue Nick going on one of his customary revenge killing sprees. It’s slow-paced, overlong, full of ridiculous cod-serious dialogue and shot mainly in sleep-inducing darkness. Fans of gore may wish to fast forward much of the build-up… not that the climax tries to do anything other than shock with grotesque visuals. It’s different enough to be worth a punt if you’ve got the stomach for it, but it could have been so much more.

0 out of 2 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

1917

Tour de force desperately in need of an edit

(Edit) 14/08/2020

I wanted to like it more. I really did. It’s a technically brilliant tour de force as we Steadicam around in the footsteps of two WW1 soldiers. The main problem is the film’s USP: everything happens in real-time as a pretend-single shot. As a result, plodding around with our two soldiers, in whom we have no emotional investment, soon drags. To add interest you can fast-forward to make them walk faster and you’ll miss nothing except time-filling banter. To add further interest, try to spot the joins in the supposedly single shot.

Following a well-executed plane crash, things pick up in the second hour with the occasional stirring scene, including a night chase through a burning town. But the film is always dragged back down to the mundane by the necessity to avoid an edit or change of viewpoint. Don’t expect any sweeping aerial shots or arresting changes of scene or tone here. As in other single-shot films (Russian Ark, Birdman), the technique is deliberately limiting, prone to longueurs (if only in getting an actor from point A to point B) and relentlessly viewer-unfriendly. Sure, it’s technically brilliant and expertly choreographed, but the whole is considerably less than the sum of its stand-out parts.

0 out of 1 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Monos

Sheer rubbish

(Edit) 07/08/2020

Boring, poorly shot, mostly score-free, documentary-style Columbian film – the kind praised by ridiculous arthouse critics before being rubbished by any discerning movie lover. It begins as a right-old mish-mash of scenes of teenage rebels playing soldiers in the wilds. If you stick with it, which is unlikely, it ends up in the jungle, where they continue mucking about.

The Making Of doc on the DVD shows that the director had all the equipment and resources needed to make a good film, but the amateurish end-result looks like a student’s first attempt.

0 out of 4 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

Same old, same old

(Edit) 31/07/2020

If you like this kind of guff, you’ll like this kind of guff. Others will find it a painful watch and soon wish they were far far away in a distant galaxy. As in previous instalments baddie Adam Driver is the only interesting character. And let’s hope this truly is the last we’ll see of the whole franchise so that we’ll never again have to listen to John Williams’ relentlessly awful bombastic brain-numbing muzak. Director J J Abrams once showed promise, so let’s hope he can now move on to more interesting fare.

0 out of 1 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Primal

Another laughingly bad Nicholas Cage dud

(Edit) 24/07/2020

Animal hunter Cage, as hammy as ever, is on his way from Brazil to the States with a cargo of wild animals for zoos. And guess what? There’s a captured serial killer on board – a ridiculously gurning Kevin Durand. He’s being extradited, but naturally he gets loose and so do the animals. The film’s USP are the cgi wild animals, but we see little of them (to save money?). Basically it’s just another boring film about a killer in an enclosed space and is mostly filled with scenes of people prowling around the boat looking for Gurning Kevin. Fast-forward fare from start to finish.

1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Doctor Sleep

Overlong pot boiler runs out of ‘steam’

(Edit) 16/07/2020

A belated sequel to The Shining, an over-rated and tedious film that was most notable for Kubrick making his lead actor overact and giving his lead actress a nervous breakdown. Doctor Sleep is a similarly overlong film with an initially tedious scattergun plot that takes a whole hour to come together. Boy Danny from the original film has now grown up into Ewan McGregor (given little to do) and we’re introduced to a mystical group called the True Knot, who elongate their lives by inhaling ‘steam’ (the breath of murdered children). Presumably we’re not meant to laugh at child murder, but it’s difficult to take this nonsense seriously.

Things do pick up in the second hour when the cast divides into goodies and baddies and there are some watchable altercations, including even an old-fashioned gun battle, but it doesn’t last. The final tedious half-hour is more concerned with re-living scenes from The Shining that serving the plot, resulting in a groan-worthy damp squib of an ending.

1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Roma

Technically brilliant, dramatically tedious

(Edit) 09/07/2020

Here’s the plot, such as it is, based on the childhood of director Alfonso Cuaron: a maid goes about her business, looking after a well-off family in 1970s Mexico City. That’s it. A glorified but mundane soap opera. Even worse, it’s filmed as a documentary-style fly-on-the-wall piece. We observe the characters rather than engage with them.

And yet… Cuaron films in coruscating black and white with such astonishing depth of field that his shots are amazing to look at. Never has there been so much going on in a frame since Citizen Kane. Most films focus on one thing and leave the rest of the frame out of focus. In Roma everything is in focus, enabling the viewer’s eye to rove around it at will. There’s a scene in a packed cinema, shot from the back stalls, looking to the screen past lovers in the foreground, that is simply beautiful. When Orson Welles adopted the same technique (although often using split screen to obtain the effect) it was breathtaking. Roma has that same ground-breaking feel about it.

If only there was something to engage the emotions or the intellect, this would be a masterpiece. Instead, it will have you aching for something, anything to happen. The trailer makers realise this by tempting you with a montage of short scenes choreographed to Pink Floyd’s The Great Gig in the Sky. Be advised that the film itself is nothing like this. It’s full of long static takes, with none of the movement Cuaron used so effectively in Children of Men, and it’s sadly lacking in anything even remotely resembling a rousing soundtrack. There is much to admire in Roma, but many viewers will find it one long bore.

1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Ready or Not

Remarkable mix of fun and thrills

(Edit) 06/07/2020

A remarkable comedy thriller set in and around a big house that is everything Knives Are Out wishes it could be. Newly-wed Samara Weaving discovers on her wedding night that she’s married into a family of “psycho-killers” and they’re out to get her before dawn with an assortment of weapons they barely know how to use. Funny? You bet. One of them even has to look up how to use his crossbow on Youtube.

It’s not easy to walk the tightrope between fun and thrills, but this film finds the perfect mix, with each adding to the other. Together with great dialogue, Weaving’s naturalistic performance grounds the film in a way that cleverly heightens the increasing mayhem. With a cracking pace and directorial flair, there’s never a dull moment. Okay, so it’s a genre film with no pretensions to emotional or philosophical depth, but judged purely as a film this well deserves it’s four stars. Watch out for that rusty nail!

0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

On Chesil Beach

Ho-hum actors’ piece

(Edit) 26/06/2020

Stagey melodrama set mostly in a single room and on the eponymous beach. Numerous irritating flashbacks explain what led up to the present but add nothing to the non-action. Scored by a string quartet that adds to the theatricality. There’s a brief emotional coda but it comes far too late to do anything but show what most of the film lacks.

2 out of 3 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Gemini Man

Imaginative but disappointing actioner

(Edit) 24/06/2020

Why watch this film? The ridiculous trailer tells the whole story and shows all the best bits without the boring talkie stuff. Although touted as sci-fi this is really a would-be globe-trotting action thriller in the Bourne mould. Its USP (hardly a spoiler) is that agency hit man Will Smith is on the run from his younger cloned self. Talking heads on the DVD Xtras are proud to have created the best-ever digital human, but the effects don’t always work and the action scenes would have been better with an actual adversary than with a digital version of our hero. Instead of getting involved in a scene you’re more likely to play ‘spot the join’.

Director Ang Lee was lured by the premise and tries to inject some existential subtext into affairs, but this just falls flat and slows down the pace. The best set-piece is a terrific parkour-type chase in Cartagena near the beginning. After that it degenerates and ends in a generic shoot-em-up finale. Quite a disappointment from Ang Lee, but worth watching for the good bits.

0 out of 1 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Midway

Rousing Pacific War Epic

(Edit) 22/06/2020

A solid modern take on the old-school war film that many people will unfairly dismiss as a politically incorrect boys’ gung-ho movie. This is so determinedly authentic even the corny scenes are true. What screenwriter in his right mind would make his hero a gum-chewing pilot called Dick Best? But he actually existed, as did all the main characters and all the plotlines. The moving finale shows you the real people that the film portrays.

Much of the Pacific War is now forgotten or unknown to a younger generation. It deserves to be better remembered… Pearl Harbour, the Coral Sea, the daring Doolittle Raid… This film shows what a fascinating and bloody battle arena it was. Shame on those who denigrate it for its depiction of heroism.

Hard to believe all the mayhem and destruction we see (on land, sea, air and undersea) was done on a sound stage and in post-production, but the end result has an epic quality. You’ll believe you’re in the midst of it. Director Roland Emmerich (Independence Day etc.) has long been adept at this kind of scale. The excellent DVD Xtras will make you realise what a labour of love this film was and make you want to watch it again with even greater appreciation.

1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Jumanji: The Next Level

Less funny retread

(Edit) 13/06/2020

Not nearly so much fun second time around. Our four avatars play different, less interesting, characters and fail to dredge up much humour with lifeless banter and stale action sequences. Confusingly, they also switch characters until you’re never quite sure who is who. Still, there’s some gorgeous desert and mountain scenery (NB no jungle this time around) and an occasional cgi set piece to keep you watching. Best bit: an imaginative set piece on a maze of swinging rope bridges above a chasm. The DVD also includes a vomit-inducing making-of doc that is nothing more than a hagiography to the film’s brilliance – always a desperate sign.

1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.
12122232425262728293057