Film Reviews by TB

After Call Me By Your Name, the re-pairing of Luca Guadagnino, Timothée Chalamet and Michael Stuhlbarg in a film was always going to generate a lot of interest. And even though there is a significantly larger budget this time around, strangely enough in many ways it feels much smaller and more intimate, which is absolutely to it’s credit.

The main thrust of the story is about cannibals (eaters) and how they navigate through the world. In a funny way, it’s like a less action-oriented, road-movie Blade. But even though it has this provocative story, in many ways the narrative is actually not that important. Far more time is given to building the characters and the world that they live in. To me, this is emphatically a good thing. A film like this could so easily have become a turgid, lumpy mess with the wrong storyline, but the lightness of touch is welcome.

Obviously, being a Luca Guadagnino film, it looks and sounds incredible. As with CMBYN, the whole film is shot on 35mm film, with a soft focus and muted colour palette. Arseni Khachaturan’s work is masterful, perfectly creating the Mise-en-scène as well as the beautiful sweeping landscapes and vistas of the different US states. The soundtrack most strongly reminded me of Stanley Myers’s Cavatina from The Deer Hunter, which is the highest praise I can give: simple but powerful guitar pieces which perfectly go with the images.

Alongside the actors mentioned at the beginning, there is some great supporting actors. As is a running theme with some of my other reviews, this is another film where a supporting actor steals every scene they are in and in this instance it is Mark Rylance as Sully. He makes your skin crawl, but has a childlike innocence which makes his actions even more warped. His chemistry with the lead actors is also excellent.

For some viewers, this film will be too weird, too idiosyncratic or too slow. But for me, it was a really interesting and trippy ride. Really enjoyable and beautiful on the eye.

I had never seen any cut of Apocalypse Now, although I had heard it spoken of in reverence as one of the best films ever made. As so many older films are being remastered for 4K and the results are usually stunning, I decided to hold out for Apocalypse Now as well.

Despite my mixed views about the film itself, the remastering is far and away the best thing about it. It is perfect and flawless. Whereas on the blurb it usually says something along the lines of "Every shot has been expertly restored," with the 4K remaster, it genuinely looks it. The colours are amazing, and the sound crystal clear. The 4K disk also contains "The Final Cut," which Francis Ford Coppola says during the introduction was a completely new cut and his preferred one, a bit shorter than the Redux, but longer than the theatrical. To me though, even this Final Cut is too long. After the incredible action-packed scenes as Martin Sheen's character is transported into Vietnam, the film then loses a lot of momentum which it never really recovers.

It was still enjoyable and absolutely is a classic, but for me, as much as usually extended/director's cuts are often better than the originals, in this case even the Final Cut pushed my viewing patience. But still a recommend watch.

A very interesting and well-acted series. The murder of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman was nothing short of absolute evil, combined with a shocking abuse of trust, and this programme absolutely shows the panic and the horror when the girls went missing.

Commendably, what this drama does do exceptionally well is give Maxine Carr a voice which was lost in the enormous media and hysteria machine surrounding the murders. Many people have said, in my opinion quite rightly, about how she was in many ways the subject of far more vilification and hatred than Ian Huntley, who actually committed the murders. This is absolutely unfair and wrong, and something which I had thought for years, and I was pleased that it is shown clearly that as much as what she did in lying to provide an alibi was heinous and wrong, that should not remove one iota of the condemnation and disgust anyone needs to feel towards Huntley.

It is also shown very clearly how she is manipulated and controlled by Huntley, with repeated assaults, threatening and coercion. Whilst some people will say that this is no excuse, to simply ignore how domestic abusers control and destroy lives ends up giving the abusers themselves more power.

The performances are exceptional, although for me, as much as Jemma Carlton absolutely gives it her all and provides a very compelling anti-hero, it is Scott Reid who made the bigger impact. Reid’s performance as Huntley is so disturbingly accurate, toe-curling and compelling that once the credits rolled, that was the lasting impact for me. Huntley was an absolute verminous monster, controlling everyone by either threats, intimidation or when that failed, suicide attempts to try and get his way.

There was also a sub-plot around composite characters of members of the press, which tried to paint them in a slightly more sympathetic light. Unfortunately, as has been the case multiple times recently with these sorts of high-profile murder investigations, the press has repeatedly behaved absolutely despicably towards family members, going so far over the lines of decency and morals that they had forgotten what they looked like when they passed them.

Definitely a good watch, but not an easy one.

Much has been said and written about House of Gucci. There was the predictable backlash from the Gucci family, which is understable in many ways, seeing as the film is VERY liberal with the sequence of events; (Tom Ford was quoted as feeling not only very uncomfortable but also pointing out that, unlike in the film, he hadn't even been brought into the Gucci empire when the events depicted happened,) and none of the Gucci's themselves come out of the film particularly well.

But what this film does have in spades is also what makes it so enjoyable: it is totally, off-the-wall, bats**t crazy. For a film like this to come out of the studio system of today is a marvel, in the best way possible. It looks amazing, the actors are all committed totally to their roles and what a cast there is to perform. I especially liked that the big-name actors who quite easily could have been brought in for cameos actually have decent, meaty scenes together. A particular highlight is Jeremy Irons and Al Pacino, and also Pacino with Jared Leto.

Leto himself is also a joy to watch. Whilst it has been said that he is overacting and for some people his performance is too much, to me they simply have not bought into the film's world and styling. The overacting is what contributes to the film's craziness. His rant at the main characters after a particularly brutal turn of events is by turns tragic but also hysterical.

But this film belongs to Lady Gaga. She is genuinely perfect, totally committed and her performance is in no way a caricature, which it so easily could become. The accent is perfect and she completely commits to her role. When the end credits roll and there is the footage of the real Patrizia, you see just how accurate Gaga's performance was.

Finally to Ridley Scott, please keep making these incredible films. We are so lucky to have you still cranking out film after film after film and long may it continue.

This review is, as mentioned above, for the extended version (Only available on Blu-Ray.) I have seen both versions and by far the extended is the better of the two. Whilst the theatrical is still excellent, to me the extended is the one to watch.

I loved this film. Loved, loved, loved, loved it. It is the first script written by Cormac McCarthy, based on an original idea. It totally ignores the usual tropes of cinema. Characters speak in no way like in the real world. There are many scenes of heavy dialogue/discussions, some of which go to completely unexpected places. The scenery and cinematography is perfect. And the best part is when things start to go wrong, they really go badly, horribly wrong. No punches are pulled in this film, and believe me, it earns it's 18 rating.

In many ways, it's like a weird flip of the plot of Sexy Beast and they do share some of the same DNA. But unlike films where it is always "I just want to do one deal then get out" and then get further into that world, The Counsellor (his name is never given) genuinely wants only to do one deal. Which makes it all the more tragic when everything goes wrong.

The roll call of actors is also incredible, even in bit parts. Bruno Ganz, Toby Kebbell and John Leguizamo turn up for memorable moments and especially Kebbell is great with what is basically a 5 minute interlude. Fassbender continued his streak of great lead roles. His Counsellor is many things, but also I loved how he still thought even at the end he could bargain, negotiate and smooth his way out of the total horror of what he was involved in. Brad Pitt as the middle man was also a great role, knowing exactly what he was in, but also amusingly feeling he could escape the fate that he was predicting for others. Cameron Diaz plays against type and this provides dividends. It was also great to see Javier Bardem and Penelopé Cruz on screen together again.

But everything was totally overshadowed by the flawless scene between Rubén Blades's character and The Counsellor. Again, with around 10 minutes of screen time, Blades gives a masterclass in film acting. To me, this was the same level as Michael Stuhlbarg's speech at the end of Call Me By Your Name or Ewan McGregor's phone call in The Impossible. It was, to me, a scene so good it could almost stand alone as it's own separate short film. I don't want to say any more, as to not ruin the moment, but it is perfection.

For some, The Counsellor will be too violent, too talky, too long, too boring ect ect. To me, this totally misses the point. This is a world where "The normal rules of exchange do not apply." This is McCarthy's world, where the calvary do not come, where the paybacks are horrific and nothing can stop the onslaught.

A masterpiece

After the blatant and almost embarrassing attempt by Tom Hiddleston in The Night Manager to audition for James Bond, now it's Sam Heughan's turn. But whereas The Night Manager was a no expenses spared, beautifully shot and acted drama, this is a Sky movies produced, almost run-of-the-mill action film, designed to be a crowd pleasing, Friday night film (which of course there is nothing wrong with.)

But, even though it was based on a series of successful novels by Andy McNab, there is very little that sets it apart from many other spy novels/stories. You can see what is going to happen a mile off and clichés are thrown about with abandon. There are also some very unintentionally funny moments. My two favourites was that the main character's country estate is the same one used for Bruce Wayne's in the Nolan Dark Knight films and there is even an identical shot (framing/composition) in this film as there was in Batman Begins. The other is that despite this being filled with Sky/associated branding and products, the producers refused to pay Eurostar for using their trains, resulting in terrible CGI trying to paint out the branding.

I also appreciate that the budget will not have been massive, but the sets still look very cheap. I did like the colour pallet and some of the early shots of Georgia/London were pretty.

Another amusing similarity between The Night Manager and this film is how the main character/lead actor is completely overshadowed by a member of the supporting cast. Whilst in Night Manager it was Hugh Laurie and Tom Hollander, in Red Notice it is Ruby Rose. She is absolutely fantastic and far & away the best bit of the film. Every time she was on screen, the tension was ratcheted up and the film came alive. Heughan tries his best, as do the other supporting players, but Rose wipes the floor with them.

See it for her and not much else.

Frances McDormand is on a real roll at the moment. The excellent Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri is now followed by this gentle, delicate film about trying to deal with the way life can change in an instant. And this is no companion piece to Three Billboards. Mildred Hayes is the polar opposite of Fern, a steely but also emotionally broken woman who had everything planned out but then lost it all through no fault of her own.

I loved the way that many of the people who appear are real-life nomads. This gives genuine emotional heft to the story. It is also clear that whilst filming, the cast and also the crew lived that life to experience what it really is like.

McDormand is outstanding and it is clear why she won her third Best Actor Oscar, alongside an Oscar for producing. The role is one which needs emotion but also intense vulnerability, without it becoming a caricature. Needless to say, this is met and exceeded. David Strathairn also makes an impact in a light but also significant role within Fern's life.

Three moments which really stuck out for me was the opening scene when you see Fern's reaction to coming into contact with her passed husband's jumper, beautifully underplayed but so powerful. The second was a scene where Fern is so taken and at peace with the beautiful surroundings that she strips off and bathes in a secluded piece of water, illustrating so well the ambience she feels. And thirdly, one of the final scenes where she has in front of her the offer and promise of a new, more stable life within a home and wakes up in the middle of the night unsettled and listless, walking round and knowing that this is not the life she wants.

This is the first film I have seen directed by Chloé Zhao, who also wrote, produced and edited the film. She is a very exciting and dynamic film maker, who also has that beautiful skill of being able to observe and let the characters and atmosphere breathe without it being boring or using it as padding.

A great film and easy watching, but with a powerful message.

Conceived as an off-the-wall comedy and transformed from the script by the genius of Jim Carrey's improvisation, this was one of the films that defined the 90's. Completely crazy & and in no way taking itself seriously, it remains to me one of the definitive comedies ever made.

Carrey plays the titular detective, searching for a stolen dolphin and uncovering a schlocky scheme to extort a ransom. And that's basically the plot.

Without Carrey, this film would be nothing. Ace's tics and traits are all Carrey's creation and being allowed to let loose is what makes this film great.

It is also divisive in many ways, whether because of the humour and just how surreal it can be, or being retrospectively criticised & condemned/compared to today's standards by some people.

To me, if you are genuinely offended, upset or take in any way seriously a film character whose signature move is to pretend to talk out of his backside, then nothing that is written here will change your mind otherwise.

For everyone else, this is a comedy to laugh your head off to and gets better with each viewing. Highly recommended

This is a stunning film, made on a tiny budget, with not an ounce of excess/uneeded exposition or bloat.

Lesley Manville is perfect in the role and Liam Neeson, who is known for his leading man status and powerful prescence, eschews all of this to become in many ways the lost and worried husband, powerless to stop the pain and upset his wife is going through.

There are many tender moments, but the two that really stick in my mind is the meeting of an old school teacher in hospital and reminising about the daughter that has passed (no reason is given as to why, which to me is a very good thing, as there is already so much going on within the narrative;) and a beautifully shot, unbelievably tender love scene where, before she starts the treatment for cancer, the couple "say goodbye" to the body that she has before it changes forever.

I have not had experience of the trauma that is shown in the film, but one thing which did also resonate with me was that there is in these situations, no perfect answer. One scene where everything becomes too much and the characters are having their own seperate breakdowns in different rooms only highlights that whilst they may feel so far from each other, they also are so close.

Thoroughly recommended and wonderfully performed

A deeply unsettling and disturbing film about the way outsiders and loners, especially those with mental health problems, exist in the world today. The very low budget actually really helps the film’s look and atmosphere, whether in the grimy shots of Tony walking around London or the scenes inside his flat.

Where the film also works well is in how the violence is shown and acted. The scenes bristle with menace and the actual violence itself is extremely unpleasant, restrained and emphatically not gratuitous, which only adds to the heft.

Peter Ferdinando, who has an incredible and chameleonic ability to transform completely into these different characters, gives a very good performance and the film would fail without him.

I did feel that at points the film seemed to meander and get lost, and it's just over 90 minutes runtime was stretching the story just that little bit too much. But this is a solid and impactful film and shows how great micro-budget British films can be.

Color of Night is many things. Whilst masterpiece is definitely not one of them, not for a single second was I bored. It is an extremely dated, silly, corny, cheesy product of its time. It is filled with cliched characters, silly plot twists, but also really beautiful cinematography and two committed performances from Bruce Willis and Jane March.

March, in particular, was coming off the extremely well-received film The Lover and was in many ways the hottest actress in Hollywood. To me, she was the stronger of the two performances because it would be so easy for her to play the part as/the film portray her as a ditzy beautiful woman who is there simply for eye-candy. But she really draws you into her performance and the chemistry she has with Willis genuinely works.

This is also the film debut of Rubén Blades and he also imbues what could simply be the corny stale cop role with charisma and gravitas.

For many people, the most memorable part of the film is the extremely protracted sex scene, which manages to utilize almost every room in the mansion that Willis’s character lives in. But again, how you view this film as a whole is the level of enjoyment you’ll get out of it.

If you start watching it expecting anything other than a schlocky dated piece of fun, you’ll be disappointed. But take it with a pinch of salt and tongue firmly in cheek and you’ll have a fun 2 and a bit hours.

Disability, when portrayed on film, can not only be an incredible and powerful way to see the world from a different perspective, but also a sure-fire awards winner. My Left Foot, The Theory of Everything and Rain Man have not only stood the test of time, but also been highly coveted by the different academies and won plenty of prizes. Whilst this might be a cynical way of approaching this review, these were the emotions that I felt when watching A Beautiful Mind.

For all Russell Crowe's incredible talent in films such as Gladiator and Cinderella Man, watching him in this was like he had played Dustin Hoffman's performance of Raymond Babbit on repeat and then tried to take inspiration from the various tics and emotions. In no way am I saying that he did not try and there are some moving moments, but the film did not work for me. So much so that I stopped watching after about an hour as I simply had no interest in finishing it.

The right elements are all there: good performances from the supporting cast, including Paul Bettany and Jennifer Conolly who met and fell in love on this film; lovely music and good cinematography. But it did not work as a film for me and sadly is not one I can whole-heartedly recommend.

In a world where, once you reach a certain age (especially older women,) there are almost no films starring or made about you, The Mother was a welcome & startling revelation. Back in 2003 when it was released (I reference the year deliberately as this was before Daniel Craig was cast as James Bond/well-known,) it started a heated and much needed debate about how we as a society treat & represent the older generation. It was also a film which clearly & compassionately showed that just because people age, doesn't mean that they don't also want & need love and affection.

The central premise is a good one: a husband & wife go to see their grown-up children in London. They are treated as outsiders & ignored/ostracized. Whilst staying with their family, the husband dies suddenly & the wife/mother May is left rudderless and adrift. She tries to return home but cannot face the empty house or memories, so ends up coming back & staying with first her son then her daughter where she becomes an inconvenience which they cannot manage or deal with. The only person who starts to show any kindness or concern towards her is Darren, the builder in her son's home, who is also in the middle of a messy divorce and sleeping with May's daughter. This then turns into an affair between Darren & May, who are effectively 2 lost souls looking for meaning.

The best parts of this film are far and away the scenes between Darren & May. Daniel Craig and Anne Reid have the kind of chemistry which, if it didn't work, would mean the film would totally & utterly fail. The acting here is stripped back & completely naturalistic, and the moments with Darren & May alone work perfectly. Even though there is the much-talked about age gap, this works so well in conveying the difference the two characters have and the experiences they have both had and will be having as they grow older. The isolation that they also both experience, May in her older and now single life; Darren in how he cannot keep himself from repeatedly going off the rails with the litany of poor decisions he makes.

Unfortunately, the film also has some very big & serious issues with it, the most obvious one being just how unbelievably unsympathetic & horrible some of the characters are. These affect not only the smaller parts (the daughter-in-law is pretty much a spoilt narcissist who is shown as shallow & only interested in spending all of her husband's wealth on creating failing clothing shops,) through to May's daughter Paula.

Paula should, given the fact that her mother basically steals her boyfriend & has an affair with him, be someone who you feel intense sympathy for and relate to. But she is written as a screeching, angsty and extremely immature woman who, every time she goes off on a rant, makes you wonder how on earth she could function as an adult or indeed even be a teacher/support children. I absolutely detested her. There are several nails down a chalkboard moments, which add to this feeling, such as when she makes Darren keep reading something she has written, for no other reason than to keep the attention on her, even though you can see he would rather be anywhere else than there. It is intimated that this is partly due to childhood trauma, but I also felt that this reason was basically doing a lot of heavy lifting for her horrible personality.

The other massive flaw with the film was that when the affair is discovered, which was obviously going to happen, it is done in the most stupid & far-fetched way. This actually in one sense ruins the whole story, because the events shown are so ridiculous, it stretches credibility. Separately, on a technical level, there is a cut during the climatic scene which is so obvious, it draws attention to the film editing & ruins everything that was building up to that moment.

To summarise, somewhere in here is a great film with an important message, but a flawed script & some questionable choices leave much to desired.

Ever since Pulp Fiction, people have clamoured for the latest film from QT, hoping that it will in some ways equal that masterpiece. But the honest truth is that nothing has ever come close. I really enjoyed various parts of both Kill Bill's and the best recent film of Tarantino's is still Inglourious Basterds. But even that has sections which were overlong and could have been cut out or shot differently.

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood definitely has some great qualities to it. The scenes are perfectly shot, the costumes are great and a lot of the references from other QT films are present and correct. There are also great performances, especially from Margot Robbie. There has been some, in my opinion stupid, controversy about the fact that her character doesn't have many lines and this is another example of Hollywood maligning, patronising and insert every other negative description takes your fancy towards women. But as Tarantino has rightly said, you don't need a lot of dialogue to be able to convey a whole character and the various elements of them. And in OUATIH, Sharon Tate is probably my favourite character, precisely because we are allowed to see a very natural and honest portrayal of a woman who lives in the moment and lets the world around her exist. And Margot Robbie was also nominated for an Oscar for her performance, so the charge of not allowing her character to shine through is completely without foundation.

Brad Pitt and Leonardo Di Caprio are good company and the chemistry between them is great. There are some great cameos, particularly from Timothy Olyphant and Michael Madsen.

The problem is that the film as a whole takes a very long time to not really say very much, until the final 20 minutes, when it does jump into life. The ending is absolutely crazy, but in a good way and is very funny. It just about pulls the wheel back and rounds off what is at times a frustrating, but in parts enjoyable ride. And yes, I am looking forward to seeing QT's final film, to see exactly what he has to go out on.

This is one of the greatest films ever made.

Whilst there is a lot I could write or say about it, for once I am simply going to let the title to my review speak for itself.

Not one thing in this film is out of place, not one performance less than perfect.

This film is one of the reasons people love cinema. See for yourself the reason why.