Film Reviews by PV

This is a 1970 film based on a novel. I love the soundtracks of films of the time (like late 60s Planet of the Apes) so loved that.

WARGAMES in 1980s is sort of the same idea, and its computers also seem massively dated now. This is more dated, with the usual fake computers with pointless flashing lights. The master-brain Colossus computer presages AI, but its messages look like those digital signs at train stations or bus stops saying when the next service will arrive! It is all unintentionally funny.

Watch Dr Strangelove (1964) for a class classic version of the same sort of thing, with a Doomsday Machine. Also based on a novel. Worries about nuclear war were great back then, in 1950s, 1960s 70s and 80s. People have forgotten the nuclear warheads are all there and still exist, many controlled by Russia and China, India and Pakistan, as well as France, UK and USA. All it takes is one mistake or madman or woman...

It is a slight story, which becomes bogged down in the main character's lovelife and relationship, which is tiresome. But where else can the story go?

Of course no-one then expected the Soviet Union to end in 1991 or Communism to collapse in 1989 when the Berlin Wall came down - we live with the consequences now, re the Ukraine-Russia war. Putin is bitter Gorbachev gave Ukraine away and let them keep nuclear missiles, and Crimea (only transferred to The Ukraine in USSR in 1950s by Khruschev for easier admin).

A curiosity piece. Reminds me of 1970s classics like WESTWORLD (with primitive computers, the first special effects Oscar winner, 1973), and CAPRICORN ONE.

3.5 stars rounded up

This is a truly terrible film. I am not familiar with the Jules Verne story this is based on, but it is clearly not one of his best, The Hokum science actually made me laugh out loud as did much else.

Neathderthals portrayed as ape men; big busted blonde totty cavegirls and bearded cavemen from two tribes.

As for the monsters - well, reminds me of the end of one version of Journey to the Centre of the Earth where they filmed live lizards near small rocks to made em look big. That is the playbook here except for some bizarre flying dragon thing, parallel evolution 'parently, and some cartoon mammoths.

Tbh I felt really sorry for the animals used. An elephant with fur stuck on to create a little mammoth; a crocodile or smaller caiman more likely with a fin glued to its back which fights a lizard to the death (animals were harmed making this movie!) and a snake killed by a lizard. NOT one for sensitive animal lovers/.

A curiosity piece. 1.5 stars for effort.

I loved this. Co-written by ay Harryhausen himself, this is the first time we see a skeleton come to life and fight, which presages the classic Jason and the Argonauts (1963) final dragons' teeth skeleton battle scene.

This is 1958 and part of the 1940s and 50s quest by studios for the most lush colour system, e.g. Technicolour - hence lots of Arabian Nights stuff with magic carpets and lush exotic costumes and colours. I think this is the first of the Sinbad films. 1977's Eye of the Tiger was also co-written by Ray Harryhausen.

The characters are three-dimensional and really work, well-played by the actors, as does the story - the way people get hung up now on 'authenticity' but only for characters of colour (though when white characters are concerned the opposite is demanded - colourblind casting) is petty and absurd. AS IF Will Smith is an authentic black genie! I like the old way better. It works.

Great score and settings - I spotted THE ALHAMBRA in GRANADA, and the famous 14th century lion fountain (so much for Islam not allowing the artistic depiction of living things - well, the Caliphs did in 14th C with the lions. The Palace/Court of the Lions" or "Court of the Lions" is at the centre of the ALHAMBA complex where Muslims ruled southern Spain for 600 years (and all but one Caliph in 6 centuries had blue eyes, highly values by them, hence the white slaves taken from northern Europe - the mums of all Caliphs). SO a pale-skinned blue-eyed actor playing an Arab of the time is very authentic actually, as the upper class Caliphs looked more 'white' than Arab/black.

4 stars

OK so this movie has, for reasons that escape me, won awards and got a great critical response - I think that has something to do with the woke metoo revenge themes ticking dem boxes. Because really, this is pure shlock horror, peak B-Movie. Nothing wrong with that BUT that is all it is.

One aspect of this film I liked was the handbrake turn new scenes and settings - which happen twice (no spoilers). It jolts the viewer out of their comfort zone which is nice.

But really, the plot of more full of holes that the potholed roads of Detroit, and do not even start thinking about timelines or you'll enter a rabbit hole of "how can that be when..." and "why is is that...". Just let it flow over you...

I could predict the fate of one character here as soon as they appear - the new woke revenge trope is now often used in films. The issue of the decline of Detroit is interesting, though the imagined past with a bit too Truman Show.

Utterly unbelievable from start to finish, but entertaining enough for horror fans - though it's very panto horror, a bit like a Michael Jackson video.

I liked the moments of dark humour and this film has the best use of a tape measure in a plot I have ever seen!

3 stars. Solid horror.

"The whole victim thing is a lie" one character says here - I almost shouted YES!!!! at the screen, having been the victim of female trolls/abusers/stalkers online who are JUST like the pity party poseur here - the usual victimhood-craving babywoman who weaponises lies to get revenge on any who question 'her truth', esp but not only men.

It starts slowly, going nowhere fast, and I thought this would be an arty film wallowing in self-regard, pretention and dullness. HOW WRONG I WAS! I should have known - I gave the same writer/director's first film DREAM SCENARIO 5 stars too. I greatly look forward to Kristoffer Borgli's next film/s!

The story plays with concepts of fame and attention-seeking in the digital age. Italian film REALITY (2012) is the best I've seen re reality TV fame.

But this film goes further. Via very clever and subtle steps, we see the main character, a self-pitying cafe manager, metamorphise into full-blown psychopath who exhibits all the nasty, vindictive, self-obsessive traits of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. The delusions of grandeur mean anyone who dares question or slight the 'victim' and all their fake disorders ends up getting targeted as an 'enemy'. I have seen this. I have lived this, via deeply deranged malicious online attackers (one psychowoman esp).

Anyway, watch it for yourself. I shall watch this again in a few weeks/months for sure as there are brilliant characters are little blips and plants all the way through, so you have to concentrate when watching this. If you want a brainless film experience, watch Barbie. Want a brilliantly intelligent film and a deliciously vicious and true satire, watch this.

Brilliant stuff. 5 stars.

OK so I see I gave the first film 3 stars,. though have little memory of it, and I give this the same - just.

Some class moments; the usual in-jokes re JAWS and now JURASSIC PARK too. Some impressive visuals.

But flabby and/or bloated, esp the end section - maybe this is to pander to Chinese audiences?

Very much a B-movie, but a watchable one.

3 stars

This is getting bad reviews galore BUT I enjoyed it. True, it is a rather glowing biopic and if you watch the EXTRA film, you see the Marley family was closely involved.

But most biopics are like that. What this has in addition is great music including Bob's songs. Other biopics like the Hendrix one ALL BY MY SIDE (2013) lack the songs Jimi wrote due to family objections (hence the reliance of cover versions, Wild Thing, Sgt Pepper etc, songs not written by him).

Lots of spiritual guff promoted here - but the whole reason Bob Marley succeeded and was, and is, a star is the music - his songwriting, and records and performance. NOT the Rasta thing or the rest. (Oddly NO WOMAN NO CRY is not credited to Bob though he almost certainly wrote it, the tune at least, and gave the credit to a local free kitchen organised to raise funds).

The London scenes are great, I thought, and European ones. I do not know much re Jamaican politics but it looks pretty violent and chaotic - and worse since 1980s thanks to the drugs trade and so much violence (ask residents of Martinique if they want to be independent like Jamaica and not one will say YES - safer to be part of France, get EU passport too, because these French islands are all EU territory).

A shame no mention of Bob's time in the USA working in a car plant. I liked the scenes of the young Bob Marley in early 60s ska bands, and also Junior Marvin, British guitarist in the band. I disliked the focus on his wife because, well, this is not her biopic! Bob matters. The rest? Not so much.

As with all very rich and privileged people, pop stars like Lennon etc, it is hard to have sympathy for their self pity. They could always go back to doing a day job, earning a pittance (average wage in Jamaica is £50 a week I think).

Also let this be a lesson to all who delay going to the doctor and refusing medical advice - it's highly likely Bob M would have lived years longer if he had.

Anyway, not great. A film about Bob Marley rather than THEN film. But I enjoyed it. 3 stars.

I liked this and the EXTRA film with Hugh Grant etc nattering about the film. They point out that New York is a character in the film - well, kind of, but it's hardly Dickens' London.

The first disc is by far superior, esp episode 1 and 2 which kept me guessing. As it went on, the story and my interest sagged badly, especially the legal scenes, though the full amorality of the law is on display here from the savvy but cynical black female lawyer (British actor like Noah Jupe, child/teen star des nose jours).

Donald Sutherland gives his last performance aged 80-ish with the most impressive pair of old man eyebrows I have ever seen, I think...

Many people are fascinated by the super-rich (see the popularity of Succession and, indeed, Dallas back in the day). I am not. Maybe because I am not female? Certainly the family and marriage melodrama bits bored me as they might not those of a female persuasion.

Danish female director Susanne Bier makes it all very Scandi Noir, which is on trend, I have no idea what the source novel is like. But if they cut out the soapy melodrama it could have been 4 episodes only, maybe 3. Focus on the whodunnit bit and dump the family dynamics and soap opera. But hey...

The plot is utterly unbelievable, of course, especially as it plods on in later episodes, but then it is fiction, not fact, and MELODRAMA, so one must expect it.

Worth a watch, 3 stars

What to say about this? Well, it is 'of its time' for sure, reminds me of TOMMY and also some late 60s and early 70s 'hippy' films, again 'of their time'. A bit like horror films too though nothing horrific here, apart from the fashions and flares.

This draws from DR FAUSTUS and the Faust legend about a man who sells his soul to the devil (from Goethe and also Christopher Marlowe's 16th c play), and also Phantom of the Opera, before the mediocre opera.

I'd never heard of Paul Williams (who stars as Swan the devil maestro here) BUT he wrote a lot of songs, Bugsy Malone musical, and lyrics for Streisand's Evergreen. Not short of royalties then! Still going in his 80s. He cowrote the Carpenters' "We've Only Just Begun" and "Rainy Days and Mondays" so kudos for that! He cowrote 'Fill Your Heart' one of the weakest songs on David Bowie's 4th and possibly best album Hunky Dory (1971) or joint 1st with Scary Monsters.

There are better music industry movies - KILLING BONO (2011), KILL YOUR FRIENDS (2015), VELVERT GOLDMINE (1998), THAT'LL BE THE DAY (1973) and more. AND there are better rock musicals with way more catchy tunes, such as TOMMY (1975) of course, QUADROPHENIA (1979) and THE ROCKY HORROR PICTURE SHOW (1975).

But this is an interesting watch, a curio, by a director whose star rose later, Brian De Palma.

3 stars

First, this is about the USA. The UK has NEVER EVER had race laws. Slavery was banned in England in 11th Century AD and died out by mid 13th century. Then the UK banned slavery and spread and enforced that ban around the world, freeing over 100,000 African slaves from ships, and founding Sierra Leone for freed slaves from Canada. African states and kings and Arabs all opposed the end of slavery which was and is still now (with 40 million slaves in the world in 2024) a huge soruce of income and part of their culture. I am SO SICK of people assuming the UK is the USA, and hate the way BLM and US race politics has seeped into the UK, causing division.

Second, this is sadly a film which attempts to link events of 1960s and 50s and before with the 21st century and Black Lives Matter, and deaths of black people now (mostly killed/shot by black people it has to be said). Full facts of each case need to be examined, the assumption any shooting of a black person is a racist killing is wrong and yes, racist. There was and is huge racism FROM people of colour in the USA who wanted and want segregation, black only areas, radio stations, films, businesses, media, TV, schools universities (Browns is black and female only! How diverse - not!)

SO a mixed bag - the way the odious racist Malcolm X is eulogised is silly. WHY is it that the black converts to Islam like him and Mo Ali never seem to know about the Arab slave trade which was slaving in Africa 1000 years before white Europeans? Why no knowledge of African on African slave trading, or Asian trade, or the 2.5 million white European slaves stolen by Arabs and traded on. There were white slaves in the southern African kingdom of Mali in the 14th century.

BUT I enjoyed bits of it, and like Baldwin as a writer MORE than as a speaker. I'd have liked to know more about his time in Paris really and his gay identity. This is based on the notes Baldwin made in the late 1970s but he abandoned the book - he did not die until 1987 in France where he lived from 1970 and before that from 1948 to 1957. Many black artists and musicians like Nina Simone too were attracted to France, a romanticism maybe, as certainly the racism there is stronger than in Britain, esp in rural areas.

My favourite parts were clips of old films from 1930s and 40s, some of which our perpetually triggered woke media would NEVER broadcast now.

So more relevant to the USA and NOTHING to do with the UK (which in 1939 had just 6000 black people out of a population of 44 million).

3 stars. Could have been SO much better.

Seeing the Spanish writer and director for this, I successfully guessed the themes and plot that would emerge and the twist (no spoilers).

Similar movies like The Orphanage and The Others make it so. This is sort of GOTHIC SUPERNATURAL too.

The first half is excellent, some real edge of your seat stuff, and genuine mystery - which keeps you wondering.

Then in act three it all going a bit OTT splat, and the until-then credible plot challenges our suspension of belief.

Having said that, it';s a decent watch esp with George McKay in it - here aged 25, a film actor since age 13 in JOHNNY AND THE BOMB, and hit big with PRIDE and 1917. defo a future Oscar winner imho.

This is an OK watch, squarely aimed at a teen market,.

Somewhat crude and even now just 3 or 4 years after its release, VERY dated by the party political references.

I am no prude but find the need for gross references and leery language unnecessary - it doe snot make the main character a strong and independent young woman at all but quite the reverse, it makes her appear childish.

A bonkers plot which I suppose is magic realism in a way.

reminded me a bit of the way superior late 1950s THE BLOB. or the fun 2014 film COOTIES.

This is a real full-on Friday night teen film, probably best watched in a noisy crowded cinema, and possibly when as drunk as the character gets...

3 stars.

Many thanks for all the reviews - the one star ones dominate. On the basis of that I shall not record this on BBC1 later tonight (though Radio Times bafflingly gives it 3 stars of 5, maybe coz it is female-directed with a female lead? I have noticed that bias before in reviews and scores).

I shall therefore not watch 85 minutes of my time.

Instead I shall record Spontaneous (2020) on another channel, on at the same time.

I think GREMLINS the film or the original TWILIGHT ZONE episode are worth a watch more than this.

Nonsense and hokum yes, but enjoyable for what it is.

Lots of CGI animals and gore.

Cartoon characters, 2-D and wafer-thin, with a flimsy absurd plot, but what else would one expect?

It's a fag packet movie - the whole thing can easily be written down on the back of one.

Apeing Jurassic Park and Silence of the Lambs.

2.5 stars

I was not sure what to expect here - I tend to dislike misery memoir pity party biopics written by people about their childhoods. But this is more complex than that.

The acting is great and moving, and the script is authentic - Shia LaBeouf is not an actor I know much but he here plays his own felon druggie boozer hippy dad, and plays it well. Noah Jupe is great as the 12 year old Shia and Lucas Hedges as the lost 22 year old.

I liked the trippy dreamy aspects too, which made it more interesting. The director has only done documentaries before, so must be a mate of Shia I suppose to get the gig!

A bit like a MILLION LITTEL PIECES in the rehab anger stuff, and MAP TO THE STARS re the child actor trajectory - Hollywood is a monster that eats people alive it seems!

A surprisingly interesting watch, with some fun lines. 4 stars