Film Reviews by sf

Written by a committee, and too much emphasis on CGI. Too many sub plots that are irrelevant, and meaningless scenes. Lost interest after an hour.

This is the worst film that I have seen in a long time. Not even sci fi B material. All your clichés strung together, in no particular order. Ham acting, stupid scenes, no story, overdone special effects, etc. What were they thinking of when they conceived this, at all levels.

Not an amazing statement if you have any understanding of countryside life, and from which a lot of attention was received. And this was the directors intent. Nicely shot, but not really a film to sit down and watch. 2 stars as must have been really boring to edit the years of filming.

If you are a normal person who watches normal films, avoid. I lasted 20 mins, but it tries (and succeeds) to be one of those pointless, poorly shot and acted films of the 60s, before film making was regarded as a skill. Lingering shots of inane objects, close-ups of faces who then mumble solitary dialogue, by actors who clearly cannot act, with no real story to be told. If you think that salt-and-shake crisps are still the pinnacle of culinary technology, then go ahead. But film making has moved on since.

Zero plot or story line. I mean zero. Full of of mindful philosophical scenes that are just meaningless, with cheesy pretentious dialogue. It tries to mimic famous scenes from movies such as 2010 and Apocalypse Now, but in a cut-and-paste way that has no context within the film or depth. Some of the science behind some scenes is just laughable. As in comic. And the design of the space ships are bettered by Red-Dwarf and Dr Who circa 1975. Honestly one of the worst films I have ever seen, and I give at least 3 stars to any sci-fi!