There are a mixture of views as to which version of Superman II is the better, Richard Lester's or Richard Donner's. There is little doubt that Lester's version is much more polished and arguably coherent as it had the benefit of being the film the studio released theatrically. However Richard Donner, the sacked director, had a chance to put together his vision of the film and it does have it's merits although there is an inconsistency in the structure of some scenes, with some tending to drift on a little too long and others being rather hurried and sharply edited. I offer no preference because viewed today this is a DC world film that lacks the vital ingredient of darkness that came years later. These early Superman films are vey comic book in style with cartoon characters and a little too much overt comedy that weakens the film. Carrying on from the first film this has Superman (Christopher Reeve) giving up his powers so he can have a normal life with Lois Lane (Margot Kidder) only to have the inconvenient arrival of three villains led by Zod (Terence Stamp) from Krypton who are intent on enslaving mankind. Of course he finds a way back to super status and battles the bad guys. Gene Hackman has a good time as Lex Luthor and Marlon Brando is always good to see even though he's mostly a special effect here. Despite the various bouts of silliness this is probably the best of the Reeve films. Viewed today though it all seems a little puerile in style and structure even though many rate Reeve as the best cinematic Superman.