The original film Ghostbusters was 'the film'. In hindsight it should have stood alone and that was that. A great film never remade, never needing a furthered story, fun and watchable and on we go.......But this is the good old Hollywood film system and all that matters is money, so if the first film made a lot of money then it stands to reason sequels should. Then we get years later nostalgafest, as old farts look on the past and say 'Why can't we have that again?' and so we get 'reimagined' Ghostbusters. All of them are derivative of the original, diluted like a really poor glass of orange squash your granny gives you. The last one, cannot remember its name, but it had the lovely Carrie and delightful Paul in it, wasn't really awful and unwatchable, people sort of liked it. So we MUST HAVE A SEQUEL.
Err no we don't.
This is the sequel we didn't need. The effects and the film itself are slick, well-made and with some good effort put it in. The acting from the senior actors is good enough but from the youngsters it is poor. Mckenna Grace was great in the first film, no so good in this one, so obviously not 15 she looks like a grown adult, although she, I believe, was only 17 or 18 but she just looks like a grown woman and that takes you out of it. The story is so familiar, another ghost monster thing that can destroy the world, only Ghostbusters can stop it but the evil people who run New York, the mayor, and anyone in charge, want to stop them and thus nearly end the world.
It is boring if you are my age. If you are very young you might love it, lots of ghosts, young heroes, colours, flashing lights and so forth.
This fim and others are starting to make me go back in time myself and just watch films from the 90s and 80s or even further back in history and from other countries, and if I see a reimagining, run away, run far away.
Flashy, full of exploding ghosts and crazy characters, everyone was probably paid very well and walked away happy, which is more than a lot of viewers will.
Must do better.
This is a pretty solid film - it's slickly made, the plot moves along nicely, and both the newer and legacy cast are fine. If there's a slight downside, it's that it all feels slightly predictable, both in terms of the story beats and the call-backs to the original film. This ticks all the boxes you'd want in a sequel, but it doesn't really give you anything you haven't seen before. The Phoebe Spengler character probably gets the best development, with what appears to be a ghost/human lesbian romance subplot, though the resolution can be seen a mile away. Again, there's nothing really wrong with this film, but it does stick to the formula very closely. This is fine, but if there's another in the series, it would be nice if the makers had the confidence to stop looking back at the 1984 original, trust their new cast, and do something a bit different. [3.5 out of 5]
It's definitely time to retire this very uninspiring attempt at rebooting the franchise. The 1984 original should be left well alone as a great example of an original 80s comedy/fantasy and yet forty years later and following the previous attempt in 2021 to relight the fire we have this poorly scripted but big cast laden sequel. The new Ghostbusters, now relocated back to the old New York Fire Station, are reunited with the surviving old ones to fight another evil demon intent on dominating the world. Along the way there's the same 'ghosts' a couple of new ones and a feeling we've seen it all before. Paul Rudd as the so called main star, has little to do and zero funny lines and the story is mostly left to Mckenna Grace as Phoebe who does a valiant job with the hackneyed plot. I suppose the best thing is Bill Murray's cameo, he gets the best line of the whole film but blink and you'll miss it! The kids will probably love this but otherwise its a damp squib.
After the off-putting detour that was Afterlife, Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire feels like a safer entry in the franchise. It doesn’t do anything as bold as shift the location out of New York City or simply rehash of the previous films trying to establish underdogs and familiar threats. There are cameos, but they’re better utilized. There are Easter Eggs, but they don’t dominate the plot. There are new characters, but they don’t dominate much of the screen as they make room for the old. For this staging, Frozen Empire enters into a sort of Goldilocks zone, which might be suitable for fans but will likely dismay those seeking anything more than nostalgia and a tame horror film for their kids.
The good news is that this new Ghostbusters film doesn’t have the baggage of past films. Having gotten to know a new cast of characters in Afterlife, this film can proceed with the family unit of the Spenglers already established as Ghostbusters in New York City. They occupy the old firehouse and are introduced with a fast-paced dose of zapping a ghost dragon through the city streets. They run afoul of the government with Walter Peck (William Atherton) again, trying to shut down those pesky Ghostbusters in the name of city order. They also have the backup of the previous Ghostbusters (Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Bill Murray, Annie Potts), who all pitch in with new ghost-containing developments and research on tracking down new evil entities. Some new allies are even thrown into the mix, as with a nerdy tech (James Acaster) and a misfit seller (Kumail Nanjiani).
But doesn’t that sound like too many characters? This crowding of the screen barely gives the central figures a chance to shine. There are some compelling arcs worth exploring about the Spengler family and how they try to fight for acceptance. The youngest daughter, Phoebe (Mckenna Grace), wants to prove herself as a Ghostbuster but is sidelined, leading to her forming a bond with the ghost teenager, Melody (Emily Alyn Lind). The matriarch of Callie Spengler (Carrie Coon) struggles to assert her dominance over her kids, and her new love interest, the returning Gary Grooberson (Paul Rudd), desperately wants to assume the role of a dad. There’s so little time to explore this that the Spengler son, Trevor (Finn Wolfhard), is reduced to hunting in the firehouse for Slimer to fill time and give him something to do. But wait, doesn’t Trevor already have a returning friendship with Lucky (Celeste O'Connor) to maintain? There’s just too much on this plate.
The bigger plot of saving New York also eats up any time for meaningful character development that doesn’t feel rushed with no time for jokes. To the film’s credit, at least the villain is an interesting one in concept. It’s an ancient god capable of freezing the world and was contained through ancient ghost-trapping technology. The lore is neat, and the villain's full-form design is terrifying. Watching this new threat present a challenge for the Ghostbusters gave off the same vibes as watching an episode of The Real Ghostbusters. However, while a plot in that cartoon would suffice for half an hour, this film needs some extra time to cover all its bases more extensively. There is such a rush to get through all this that some Easter Eggs are brutally forced. Some of them are subtle, as with the brief background glimpses of the Love Slime from Ghostbusters 2, but others, like the ghost in the library, require the film to stop dead in its tracks to revive an old bit.
Frozen Empire can best be summed up with an exchange between elder Ghostbusters Ray and Winston. The two of them argue about how they want to spend their golden years. Ray says he enjoys ghostbusting and wants that to be his golden years, leading Winston to agree slightly but recommend that they find a way to do it that doesn’t kill him. And that’s exactly what Frozen Empire is. It’s a Ghostbusters film with firm guardrails, restrained to be tame enough for the kids and nostalgia-baity enough for the adults. Despite some cute moments and minor cleverness here and there, this Ghostbusters film only ends up being a bland return. It’s better than the sputtering nature of 2016’s reboot and the gross nostalgic retreads of Afterlife, but that’s a low bar to cross.