The best Ridley Scott film in years
- The Last Duel review by AER
Even though this could have done with some judicious editing, The Last Duel is a chilling tale of the kind we don't see so much anymore. It was refreshing to see an old fashioned film with knights, horses and battles featuring some great actors. The plot device of telling the same story from three different POV's could have worked if each strand was substantially different from the last and its an awkward fit for a pretty straight story. Less fussiness would've have given The Last Duel its much needed pace. Where the strengths lie are in the superb performances by Matt Damon (His best for ages), Ben Affleck, and Jodie Comer. The central duel does not disappoint and the ending is quite harrowing. It's a solid and entertaining film and worth checking out. Ben Affleck & Matt Damon co-wrote this alongside the sometime director of the Parks & Recreation series, Nicole Holocefener.
7 out of 10
7 out of 9 members found this review helpful.
Interesting premise, ponderous execution
- The Last Duel review by LC
The decision to tell the same story three times over from different viewpoints is intruiging, although it does result in a rather bloated running time. The film also hammers its message home without much subtelty, with title cards highlighting both male character's stories as flawed, whilst only the female lead tells the 'real' truth. It works, but it feels slightly preachy, and I can't help but think it might have been more complex and interesting if all three leads were unreliable narrators, and let the audience make up its own mind. Acting is mostly fine, though the mishmash of English and American accents (in a film set in France) takes a bit of getting used to. Ridley Scott has thrown millions at the screen, so it look great, but I'm not sure the film needed it - other than the final duel, this feels like it could have played out as a minimalist stageplay. There's still enough here to recommend a watch, but on the whole i found this a slightly leaden experience. (3.5 out of 5)
7 out of 8 members found this review helpful.
Big, Brash Historical Epic
- The Last Duel review by GI
Highly detailed and visually spectacular this epic medieval story is typical of Ridley Scott's flair for the big, historical drama. Essentially this is a rape/revenge tale based on real events and has bloody and tough battle scenes, a great realisation of 14th Century France but is ultimately an unsubtle film. The basic story is of two knights Jean de Carrouges (Matt Damon) and Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver), friends in the army of their liege lord Pierre (Ben Affleck). But when Jean believes Jacques has cheated him of some precious land they become estranged with le Gris in favour with Pierre to the detriment of de Carrouges. When the latter's wife Marguerite (Jodie Comer) alleges Le Gris has raped her Jean appeals to the King to be allowed trial by combat. This story is told three times from the viewpoint of these three main characters with Marguerite's account left to last and which reveals possibly the truth. These all lead to the titular duel at the film's climax, and it is worth the wait because it's long, bloody and brutal with Marguerite facing being burned alive if her husband loses. There's a few astute observations along the way about class and position that have contemporary resonance and Games Of Thrones fans will delight in some of the more bloody fights and the, perhaps, unnecessary sex scenes. There will be the inevitable criticism over accents but I always forgive this as being irrelevant. Everyone is on top form and Comer especially is very good. This is a film that revels in spectacle and considering some of the subtle themes it's perhaps too blunt but still, for the most part, very entertaining.
4 out of 5 members found this review helpful.
An exceptional medieval epic you will not forget, not that well-served by its 3-part structure
- The Last Duel review by Philip in Paradiso
This is the story of the last duel of the medieval period in France (1386) that took place between 2 noblemen from Normandy (in France): Matt Damon as Sir Jean de Carrouges and Adam Driver as Jacques Le Gris. At the start, the 2 men are friends who take part in various battles of the Hundred Years' War between England and France on the side of the French king. However, over time, they fall out and become enemies: Jean de Carrouges feels that Jacques Le Gris has been unduly rewarded (with land holdings and an official position) at his expense. The last straw is when Jean de Carrouges' wife, Jodie Comer as Marguerite de Carrouges, accuses Le Gris of having raped her. Le Gris denies it. De Carrouges challenges him to a judicial duel. The duel is sanctioned by the king and actually happened (the whole story is true): it is very well documented. The idea was that, whoever survived the fight to the death would have told the truth before God, hence the other one was a liar, was guilty and deserved to die.
The film is very good mostly, in my opinion, on 2 levels. First of all, it re-creates the atmosphere, culture, hierarchies and mores of the Middle Ages in a way that seems quite accurate and realistic to me. This is quite rare for a big-budget movie like this. Second, the acting is extremely good - more particularly that of Matt Damon, as the humiliated husband who wants revenge, and Jodie Comer, as the wife who wants justice. (Incidentally, her part is far from minor in the film, and neither is her point of view with regard to the whole story, contrary to what some reviewers have written.) On this basis, the film could easily have been outstanding.
Unfortunately, there are several flaws in the way that the story is presented. The main one, as pointed out by other contributors on this site, is that the story is presented in 4 parts: the story as told from the husband's point of view; as told from the defendant's point of view; and as told from the wife's point of view; with, finally, the fight between Le Gris and his accuser (which is part of Chapter 3). This makes the story repetitive and, almost, over time, tedious. It feels laborious and contrived. It is a huge and incomprehensible mistake that Ridley Scott made, because it slows down the film in a terrible way and kills the pace of the story to a large extent. The other thing it does is make the film longer than it needs to be, at 2 1/2 hours. Finally, the story takes place in France but the characters speak with a mixture of English and American accents, which does feel weird at times!
Still, the initial presentation of the story and of the characters, at the beginning, and the last 45 mins or so, including the breathtaking duel at the end, are exceptionally good. Of the 3 versions of the story, that presented by the wife is, in fact, overall, the most interesting, credible and moving. So, on balance, I do recommend the film, but one can only regret the format chosen by the director. Without this bizarre choice, the movie could have been a masterpiece.
If you want to read up on the true story, do so after watching the film. Here, for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_de_Carrouges
3 out of 3 members found this review helpful.
Repetitive and dull
- The Last Duel review by Alphaville
One story told three ways by each of the protagonists, but Rashomon it isn’t. The first telling is all scene-setting, pompous score, horse-riding and in-yer-face medieval fighting with spurting cgi blood. The second and third retellings are little differentiated and the stilted dialogue soon becomes wearing.
This is the sort of tale that needs an Anthony Mann with his knack for shooting epic landscapes with figures. The final duel is not a patch on the one in ‘El Cid’. Director Ridley Scott suddenly switches to hand-held shaky-cam like in some two-bit action movie. And we don’t even care who wins.
2 out of 3 members found this review helpful.
Dreary
- The Last Duel review by SC
Pretty with no story, no characters and illogical jumps between locations. We gave up after 30 minutes and have watched many 2hr+ films
1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.
boring
- The Last Duel review by WW
it maybe ok for history nuts but i was so bored after the first 30min and gave up, was over enthralled about the story the script ot even the acting, wish i had not bothered
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
So boring and obvious
- The Last Duel review by AM
So boring and obvious. I am told to write at least one hundred words to make this count, so here they are:
So boring and obvious
So boring and obvious
So boring and obvious
So boring and obvious
So boring and obvious
So boring and obvious
So boring and obvious
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Rape? It is just what soldiers do.
- The Last Duel review by RW
I don't understand why this film has an 18 rating. A bit of dry humping; a bit of bloody battle; a swear word or three; otherwise pretty mild by today's standards.
Very interesting court scene where the defence quotes the known fact that conception cannot be achieved without climax by the woman. As the accuser is sitting there obviously pregnant, she must have consented so rape did not occur. QED.
It could easily cut any two of the three who-done-what accounts of the rape - they were so similar.
An entertaining film if a bit slow.
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Please let it end....... I get it.....
- The Last Duel review by JD
This is the sort of film my Girlfriend watches with our daughter a lot.
Those are usually naff affairs, but this one has been spiced up with a talented director. Its is however tedious. 90minutes are quite literally spent going over the same thing again and again and again. And Its not long before certain viewers will feel the film is telling them they must do better.....
I have nothing against the story, but why bookend it with such meticulously violent chapters? And make it so, so long when the story could be told just as effectively in 30minutes?
Its 2 stars from me, but my GF said it was really good so ill give it 3
Also, did the french really do things like run horses across rivers into spear Infantry waiting on the opposite bank? Might explain why they didnt win much...!
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.