Awful, overlong, over-rated, unbelievable, race/gender-obsessed film - TV Widows from 80s was better
- Widows review by PV
Some points about this movie which has got great reviews from the usual pc virtue-signally critics who feel they have to give a film by a black director with black actors and women starring a brilliant rating and reviews.
Unfortunately, this is a rubbish film. The massively over-rated director is only matched by the over-rated Viola David who is UTTERLY unbelievable in the role she plays. Liam Neeson's wife? Yeah right. This mixed marriage race thing may be a novelty in the mainly segregated USA but it's old hat in the UK.
Making women the bank robbers is also old hat - it was done in the far better original 1983 TV series which I watched at the time, back when it WAS a novelty (even though NO real life bank robbers are female - the wives and girlfriends just get the cash as hubbies go to prison lol!)
This is basically polemic about gender and race, box-ticking like crazy, with a few unbelievable twists and some US corrupt Chicago politics chucked in to try to give depth.
Just awful. Also boring and overlong.
If you want to watch a GREAT heist movie then rent out SEXY BEAST; if you want a better so-so heist film then get THE HATTON GARDEN JOB. This movie of WIDOWS is rash masquerading as social statement about race and gender. If this is the future of film-making, I shall not be visiting the cinema much again (and ticket sales 26% down since Hollywood became obsessed with churning our race/gender-obsessed movies galore).
1 star. Dreadful trash.
6 out of 30 members found this review helpful.
Tv is better
- Widows review by KN
Why this is highly rated is beyond me. Unexceptional dialogue and acting . No interesting plot devices but above all boring. I remember enjoying the tv series in the eighties and it’s probably dated but I imagine it’s superior to this twaddle. There are scenes that insult your intelligence.
3 out of 5 members found this review helpful.
Fascinating, original, brutal
- Widows review by CP Customer
A very difficult film to categorise and describe - a thought-provoking, intelligent thriller with enough twists to keep Chubby Checker in business for centuries.
Some truly outstanding performances, no dumbing-down and some properly evil adversaries. In fact, my only slight gripe is that I didn't truly feel able to connect with the main female lead. I truly admired her determination, fight and ruthlessness, which were brilliantly portrayed, and perhaps so well done that I didn't feel I could warm to her. I understand, but don't empathise.
Nonetheless, a refreshingly brilliant take on a classic genre.
1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.
Watching paint dry is more thrilling
- Widows review by Alphaville
Don’t be fooled by the trailer, which shows nearly all the brief action and adds an atmospheric score that the movie sorely needs but sadly lacks. Widows is thrill-less, virtually score-less, prosaic film-making, bogged down plotwise in politics and religion and visually in still shots of actorly conversations. Thrilling? If only. It’s a completely cold watch, with no characters of any interest and no visuals of any interest. It’s a film that needs a real director at the helm, not a faux-art Turner-prize wannabe filmmaker like Steve McQueen.
PS US critics loved this film while trashing the much superior Replicas, an indie sci-fi film I saw on the following night and a cinematic masterpiece by comparison. If cinema is to outlast the inroads of such as Netflix, they need to get their act together.
1 out of 5 members found this review helpful.
Waste of 15 minutes of my life
- Widows review by PB
Would have given zero, but 1 star lowest. Don't normally write reviews but this film had nothing for me, turned off at 15 minutes in. Slow wandering
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Gave up watching
- Widows review by CR
Just couldn’t get into this. Tried for half an hour and then abandoned it, something I’ve not done before. I usually persevere expecting a film to get better or at least watch it because I’ve paid for it but not this time.
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Much better than I thought!
- Widows review by HM
Not your usual heist movie; a tangled plot gives plenty to be interested in. The characters stand alone well and do not merely prop up the plot. Fine performances all round. Criminals' wives are pressured into getting their hands on money to stave off a gangsters' desire to get his money back stolen by their husbands. Exiting, action, plot; the lot. Deffo worth a viewing.
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Dont bother
- Widows review by MP
Based on a novel, but does not come up to standard as a film. Characters were flimsy and the script loose. Violence too gratuitous.
Very disappointing. Does not deserve the high rating.
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.
An enormously uneven & really mixed film, filled with some stunning performances
- Widows review by TB
After the Oscar-winning & incredible 12 Years A Slave, Steve McQueen then did exactly what you'd expect an artist of his calibre & previous work to do: go in a completely different direction to his last film & make an action/thriller film based on an 80's British TV series, but moving the action to America. Frustratingly though, this produces both inspired & also turgid/rubbish results.
The film opens with a spectacular heist, which very quickly goes very badly wrong. The gang are cornered, then desperately flee in their getaway van to the safe house, some of them sustaining serious injuries. However, they are then exposed and slaughtered in a hail of bullets by the police, leaving their broken widows to grieve them. Then, after being threatened by the man their husband's robbed, forced to become criminals themselves and target the next person on their deceased partner's list to pay back the debt.
These opening scenes are the best in the entire movie & McQueen's ability to be able to marshall this type of action really is impressive. Going from a scene of intimacy between the gang leader & his wife to being thrust straight into the action in the back of the van as the cops chase after the thieves really starts the film in a great way. However, it never again manages to hit those heights. The strangest thing for me about Widows was that when it worked, it was amazing. But so much of this film didn't fit together: characters at times were terribly written & scenes just didn't work. Plus certain actors just completely outshone everyone else because of their gravitas.
For example, the shining star by a country mile was Viola Davis. In every single thing she has been in, she has been amazing & elevated the drama. Whether it's Suicide Squad or Fences, she is perfect. And in this film, she is given a massive & expansive role as the widow of the lead gang member. But she also wipes the floor with many of the other actors/characters. They just can't keep up with her. And it is exactly the same with Daniel Kaluuya. He is introduced in a scene which suddenly descends into shocking & brutal violence, making us extremely uncomfortable with his unpredictability. But then in other scenes he is wasted & his actions just don't work within the film's narrative.
So, despite me wanting to like this film, coming after 12 Years and especially Shame, it is never any more than a 3 star film filled with as many faults as it is flashes of brilliance.
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.
I want to delete this
- Widows review by Denno
Spoiler Alert
Updated 19/05/2020
Well I decided to delete this review but it doesn’t look like you can which is a bit weird. I’m sure also my last review didn’t need to be 100 characters
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.